From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:24:03 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <48c0ee216ebb8a09d4a47532492753df@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Raspberry Pi image Topicbox-Message-UUID: bc82dac8-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Feb 19 05:16:16 EST 2014, edgecomberts@gmail.com wrote: > So the "trade secret" thing explains why you don't see a port of Plan 9 for > every new and exciting device and board that comes out. It is a shame, but > these companies producing things like the GPUs in ARM devices insist on > proprietary licences. unfortunately, a port is still a big time commitment even with all the docs. they get big, and you have to load a large amount of esoteric state into your brain. and debugging the early stages takes esoteric skills. a frequent problem is trying to debug the inital boot, since most of the easy debugging tools like print are often not available. > As far as I can tell, the i.MX6 chip from Freescale is about as open as you > can get, I'm just trying to remember where someone said it had an over > 1,000 page manual for the chip, and I'm hoping its not this very list, > otherwise I will look like a fool! The i.MX6, for that "openness" reason > has been a chip I've been meaning to get, and never gotten around to. The > UDOO board has the chip, and integrates an Arduino Due along for the ride. > Its reasonably cheap too, although availability is not something I've > looked at in a little while, and being one of those Kickstarter things, I > don't think availability is a priority past shipping them to backers. i think you're right, but i've run across devices which shall remain nameless which claim open source documentation, but when you check there docs against the linux driver you see they have nothing in common. cavet emptor. - erik