From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4938149129d38c1395e16788f3bdfff6@9srv.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 05:56:02 -0400
From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] disk/^(mbr format fdisk prep)
In-Reply-To: <01f301c4392b$837bc480$127e7d50@SOMA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7b1f43b0-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

// [kfs] has proven to be very stable, unlike fossil.

i've never found kfs to be particularly reliable when compared
to other file systems. quite the opposite, actualy. my first
hand experience with fossil is more limited (i've not converted
my file server from ken's to fossil=20
away), but so far i'm much more pleased with it than kfs.

// ...a f/s kernel that had nothing to do with plan 9...

my understanding was that it was based on an early fork of the
kernel with the user-mode stuff removed. is that incorrect?
=E3=82=A2