From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <49994c0f1100bb35bb89599995ed4c0d@huygens.org>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] killing processes
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:02:02 +0200
From: Sape Mullender <sape@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <f97779810ab82d48e1faa7846f317ea2@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8c56e806-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> In other words, Sape's complaints is more highlighting a surmountable
> drawback than really suggesting that cacheing isn't usable.  He gave
> the impression that he'd stopped useing cacheing because of this.

What I was trying to convey was that, if you reboot daily with a clean
cache, the performance improvement from the cache is hardly worth
bothering about.

	Sape