From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <49C6C6CA.5040008@orcasystems.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:16:26 -0700
From: James Tomaschke <james@orcasystems.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090121)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <1d5d51400903221517y72bf9b9bp1a4715d63894efde@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1d5d51400903221517y72bf9b9bp1a4715d63894efde@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] looking for opinions on Interprocess communication
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c1e269a6-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Fernan Bolando wrote:
> I was wondering if you guys have an opinion on the following data
> communication methods.

I would suggest using whatever method keeps the code simple. You can
worry about optimization later when you have some data on performance.
It will be easier to optimize starting from a simple implementation than
from a more complex best-guess.