From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] subtracting pointers on amd64 6c
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:27:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49fd5d8623893d1b9f0ef320dbecc403@lilly.quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgOgC9Omsdj6+KxMGEYDuZ3E+6tFF9KW-2nbN1r-bw_x-qdXg@mail.gmail.com>
> ...and arguing with it, based on assuming charles is disagreeing with
> me about reasonable behavior. he isn't. apparently, you didn't take
> the time to read what i had written in the first place. or at least
> not past the first sentence.
>
> this is really annoying to me because it tends to be a frequent thing
> you do when replying to me on this list: disagreeing with me based on
> something that seems like either assuming i don't have any basis for
> understanding what i'm talking about, or not reading what i've written
> and assuming others are disagreeing with me. the reason this is
> annoying is because i have to re-read what i've written, carefully, to
> make sure i don't have to retract anything i've said.
for the record, i did not intend to disagree with your statement.
i did want to make it clear that i, and several people i've worked with
on plan 9 have made a concerted effort to be as compliant with the
standard as reasonable; i was making a related by separate point. etc.
sorry if you took it this way. sorry for using your statement as a foil.
please accept my apology.
- erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 6:36 cinap_lenrek
2016-01-05 7:53 ` cinap_lenrek
2016-01-05 10:17 ` Charles Forsyth
2016-01-05 10:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2016-01-05 10:28 ` Charles Forsyth
2016-01-05 19:01 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2016-01-05 19:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2016-01-05 20:40 ` erik quanstrom
2016-01-05 21:53 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2016-01-05 23:27 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2016-01-05 23:37 ` Dave Eckhardt
2016-01-05 21:03 ` erik quanstrom
2016-01-05 22:32 ` cinap_lenrek
2016-01-05 22:57 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2016-01-05 23:17 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2016-01-05 23:14 ` erik quanstrom
2016-01-06 6:58 ` cinap_lenrek
2016-01-06 19:10 ` erik quanstrom
2016-01-07 1:08 ` cinap_lenrek
2016-01-08 22:23 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49fd5d8623893d1b9f0ef320dbecc403@lilly.quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).