9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John DeGood <bulk@degood.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] just an idea (Splashtop like)
Date: Sun,  2 Aug 2009 22:09:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7646DB.7020403@degood.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b47f32f6f44a6df88a9884e2cc97475f@coraid.com>

erik quanstrom wrote:
> just looking at the intel x25-e datasheet, the URE rate
> (unrecoverable read error) is the same as enterprise sata
> drives at 1e-15, but the mtbf is higher, but within a factor
> of two.
>
> assuming honest mtbf numbers, one would expect similar
> ures for the same io workload on the same size data set
> as mechanical disks.
...
> here are the datasheets.
>
> http://download.intel.com/design/flash/nand/extreme/319984.pdf
> http://www.wdc.com/en/library/spec/2879-701281.pdf

For the Intel SSD one must also consider:

> 3.5.4 Write Endurance
> 32 GB drive supports 1 petabyte of lifetime random writes and 64 GB drive supports 2 petabyte of lifetime random writes.

That is equivalent to writing the capacity of the SSD 31250 times.  At
the specified random 4K write rate of 3300 IOPS one could wear out the
SSD in 876 days.  Non-random writes could cause more rapid wear,
depending on their pattern and the wear leveling algorithms in the SSD.

John



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-03  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-31 17:50 David Leimbach
2009-08-01  1:56 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-08-01  3:12   ` ron minnich
2009-08-01 11:58     ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-01 14:51       ` tlaronde
2009-08-01 14:57         ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-01 15:49         ` ron minnich
2009-08-01 19:10           ` J.R. Mauro
2009-08-02 18:17             ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-02 19:23               ` Anthony Sorace
2009-08-02 22:16                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-03  0:23                   ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-08-03  0:37                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-03  2:09               ` John DeGood [this message]
2009-08-03  4:38                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-03 13:54                   ` John DeGood
2009-08-08  4:46               ` Dave Eckhardt
2009-08-08 11:37                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-02  2:55   ` John DeGood
2009-08-02  3:16     ` J.R. Mauro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A7646DB.7020403@degood.org \
    --to=bulk@degood.org \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).