From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4A8563B2.2010601@maht0x0r.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:16:34 +0100
From: matt <maht-9fans@maht0x0r.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20060326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <8c24ca86df8f64972adab5134764b6b9@terzarima.net>
In-Reply-To: <8c24ca86df8f64972adab5134764b6b9@terzarima.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] audio standards -- too many to choose from
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 495e508e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Charles Forsyth wrote:

>>Hardware 24bit@192kHz.
>>
>>
>
>the human ear can't hear as high as that
>still, it ought to please any passing bat!
>Hi-fi, hi-fi, ...
>
>
>
Personally I can't hear over 9119 hz (audio), but I might want to record
1s of 192Khz (samples I presume) and stretch them by 100x to 9600 hz
(audio) and have a (possibly) interesting time listening to the results
without interpolating.