From: Wes Kussmaul <wes@authentrus.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] go to this site
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:33:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE7590B.9070805@authentrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <784983fe8bc567adb9bc38032483ab0b@coraid.com>
erik quanstrom wrote:
>>>> There is a lot of residual "management doesn't understand networks and
>>>> databases and operating systems so we will make decisions for them"
>>>> attitude out there, even where the reality of management's background
>>>> has changed. While it's true that "cloud computing" is a nonsense
>>>> phrase, there are reasons why server outsourcing gains traction.
>>> if management really does understand things as well as
>>> the it guys, then the it guys were unnecessary to begin with.
>> Let's parse that.
> [...]
>>> i would hope that anyone hiring someone in such a
>>> position would be interested in their input!
>> C'mon, that's a "when did you stop beating your wife" comment. Of course
>
> why doesn't your argument work if you switch from a
> mangement to a technical perspective? i was just
> turning your argument around. why would you not
> want to listen to IT, unless they are getting in the way
> and not doing their job? that's an argument
> that runs both ways.
>
> my assumption is that if management is doing its job, then the
> problem of IT guy making policy decisions, if it happens, will
> be a resolvable problem.
>
> the argument i see you makeing is in essence that fixing management
> is impracticable. i may be cynical, but i don't subscribe to that world view.
Well, I don't think I even hinted at anything of the sort, but I'm happy
to let others, who will be happy to see the thread die, judge.
Wes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<4AE70F74.7000505@authentrus.com>
2009-10-27 15:23 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-27 15:50 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 17:32 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 18:07 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 18:59 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-27 19:57 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 20:11 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-27 20:33 ` Wes Kussmaul [this message]
2009-10-27 20:36 ` Wes Kussmaul
[not found] <<3e1162e60910270826m281a7a9awba6ea117b7351605@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-27 15:33 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-27 15:39 ` David Leimbach
2009-10-27 0:00 ron minnich
2009-10-26 20:33 ` Jacob Todd
2009-10-27 0:38 ` Joseph Stewart
2009-10-27 0:47 ` Jeff Sickel
2009-10-27 0:41 ` dave.l
2009-10-27 0:50 ` Geoffrey Avila
2009-10-27 1:52 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2009-10-27 2:39 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 13:03 ` Eris Discordia
2009-10-27 3:21 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-10-27 3:47 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 3:49 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 15:19 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 15:26 ` David Leimbach
2009-10-27 18:42 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-27 4:06 ` W B Hacker
2009-10-27 5:42 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-10-27 8:00 ` tlaronde
2009-10-27 8:12 ` lucio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE7590B.9070805@authentrus.com \
--to=wes@authentrus.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).