From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B0D8A50.5010609@conducive.org> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:49:36 +0800 From: W B Hacker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> References: <13426df10911250853g540e76bk48bd9adfce140808@mail.gmail.com> <509071940911250947m30c2dc6at609fae72b2b68cce@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <509071940911250947m30c2dc6at609fae72b2b68cce@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Scanners Topicbox-Message-UUID: a095aa78-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Anthony Sorace wrote: > where's my ethernet mouse? ;-) If Plan9 can 'plumb' a remote sound card, (a questionable example long publicized) I'm sure it can do so with a mouse. 'Questionable example', as I've never quite understood how I'd be able to hear the output of a sound card whose physically-attached speakers where half-way round the world (can we also 'plumb' the analog audio?) - even before the Tet '68 offensive took away much of my hearing. ;-) Bill > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:20, erik quanstrom wrote: >>> That's neat. It makes sense too, using ethernet almost always seems a >>> better deal than using USB. >> coraid agrees. except for the "almost" part. >> >> - erik >> >> > >