From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <4BCB673D020000CC00026F36@wlgw07.wlu.ca>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:10:37 -0400
From: "Karljurgen Feuerherm" <kfeuerherm@wlu.ca>
To: <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <20100416115756.GA1107@polynum.com>
	<201004170321.36466.corey@bitworthy.net>
	<40bd0b1a996670592133342309147bd3@kw.quanstro.net>
	<201004181226.59791.corey@bitworthy.net>
In-Reply-To: <201004181226.59791.corey@bitworthy.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [9fans] Mars Needs Women
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 07d889c6-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Could you (or someone) elaborate on the "C99" battle? I'm wondering =
whether this implies critique of the C99 standard or something else (and =
how this relates to C under Plan9)

Thanks

K

>>> Corey <corey@bitworthy.net> 18/04/2010 3:26 pm >>>

Plan 9 chose not to fight any
network protocol standards (IL not withstanding), but it _did_ choose to =
fight
the POSIX/C99 et. al battle.=20