From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <4BCC10F4020000CC00026FF4@wlgw07.wlu.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:14:44 -0400
From: "Karljurgen Feuerherm" <kfeuerherm@wlu.ca>
To: <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <20100416115756.GA1107@polynum.com>
	<201004170321.36466.corey@bitworthy.net>
	<40bd0b1a996670592133342309147bd3@kw.quanstro.net>
	<201004181226.59791.corey@bitworthy.net>
	<4BCB673D020000CC00026F36@wlgw07.wlu.ca>
	<61a3f85a641497ab85dee2454a9846d5@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <61a3f85a641497ab85dee2454a9846d5@kw.quanstro.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [9fans] Mars Needs Women
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 08e4481e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Thank-you!

K

>>> erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> 18/04/2010 11:18:39 pm >>>
> Could you (or someone) elaborate on the "C99" battle? I'm wondering =
whether this implies critique of the C99 standard or something else (and =
how this relates to C under Plan9)

ken's c compiler has some extensions.  like unnamed structures.
you don't have to use them.  i don't think that's an issue.

/sys/src/cmd/cc/c99 has a list of basic c99 features and ken's c
compiler's status wrt these new features.

- erik