From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEAzY39_rz4h3D_NcGQwuELUh0UYvmf1+Oo0HmRVAHbDyx4qyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:02:00 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4CB999B4-E9C6-4A74-B849-4003DD3D23D1@9srv.net>
References: <7f11f16bfdb01c0041b0397a1cea04c5@proxima.alt.za>
	<7dc7cfb35a012dedc41828d03d5cdff3@lilly.quanstro.net>
	<CAEAzY39_rz4h3D_NcGQwuELUh0UYvmf1+Oo0HmRVAHbDyx4qyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] running plan9 : an ideal setup?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2ccb657a-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I can't speak for Erik's cec-as-nonet setup specifically, but I've =
wanted nonet (or an equivalent) many, many times. Networks are fast =
enough that tcp/ip overhead isn't really something that hurts in most =
cases, but it does exist.

Also, I really want to exercise the cross-network parts of Plan 9.

> On Nov 19, 2014, at 10:34 , Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu <aram.h@mgk.ro> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:36 PM, erik quanstrom =
<quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> by the way, at one point i had a hacked up kernel which allowed me to
>> mount a file server over the cec protocol.
>=20
> In what situation would this be useful?
>=20
> --=20
> Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu