From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E666B1E.7080300@0x6a.com> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:49:02 -0500 From: Jack Norton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> References: <6a6903a0-796f-4124-b2f2-beb63012ec97@v7g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <4E57E2AE.9080700@0x6a.com> In-Reply-To: <4E57E2AE.9080700@0x6a.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Intel atom system Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1a305ef4-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Hi, > > I have a few of these little boards (D510MO). I read both on Eric's > site and this list that someone had these working, but I am having issues. > I've tried the lab's 9pcf, 9pccd, and 9pcf/9pccd from Eric's ftp server > (I had assumed they were from 9atom... maybe that was a bad > assumption). I also tried 9pcf from 9front. > > The lab's kernels never found the sata drives (I supposed I expected > that), and all the others find the sata hardware, but hang right after > memory capacities are printed (gee, I've seen this before... what could > it be this time... :)). > > Without me having to try a zillion different kernel/bootloader > combinations, would the people who use the D510MO sound off what > kernel/loader they are using? I'd be much obliged. > > THanks, > > Jack > As an update I'd like to point out that the D510MO works fine with 9atom or 9front kernels (lab's kernels = no sata). I in fact had a bad board. I wanted to point that out so that no one was discouraged from trying one of these little buggers out. At $70 a pop though, I'd be ready for some QC issues, which I suspect I may have stumbled upon. There is always the off chance that I fried it though... -Jack