From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4ECC28EB.2000305@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:57:47 -0500 From: "Joel C. Salomon" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111031 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 9fans@9fans.net References: <1e5fb51c21d5e84f568ff26f0f0da8a4@chula.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <1e5fb51c21d5e84f568ff26f0f0da8a4@chula.quanstro.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Returning to Plan 9: Virtualization, Distributions Topicbox-Message-UUID: 442be3ae-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 11/22/2011 10:46 AM, ron minnich wrote: > If you're serious about booting a 64-bit os you need NIX. But you're > not going to get graphics. To which, on 11/22/2011 11:00 AM, erik quanstrom responded: > today's nix is quite raw. unless you're working on nix itself, > you'll be happier with plan 9. Is NIX the only distribution for amd64, then? I just want to play around in user space: learn Go, use Unicode in C, &c., &c. Would I be better off using a 32-bit distro? —Joel