From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4b0e63b2b42fbf9628d8212bb4f3aeba@quintile.net>
From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
Date: Mon,  3 Jun 2013 23:17:57 +0100
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <3b1d8734592a97b21b60c51b3dc7b5e6@pi.att>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 62ead51a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

What I don't userstand is how do we do better
than anecdotal evidence; unless we write everything
in Z (haeven forbid).

I suppose we have some measures like "XYZfs is simpler
so its less likely to have bugs' or age 'ABCfs is so old
the bugs are more likely to have been be found', but these
are still only subjective measures. In the end we have to fall
back on 'it works for me' done we?

-Steve