From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4bd2f34b9646eb12b8b4a31373f995c5@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:36:47 -0400
To: weigelt@metux.de, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P vs. FUSE
In-Reply-To: <20070810123336.GG18939@nibiru.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a3eedc24-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> BTW: I'm still interested in functional differences between 
> FUSE and 9P. For example, does 9P support all *nix style
> inode types (ie. symlinks, devices, pipes, etc) ?

there are no inodes in 9p.  so no.

- erik