From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4bddb19f76168d998a8085d9554d3b48@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Pipes on UNIX
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  6 Sep 2007 16:33:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <45219fb00709061317x594e82a6vb43d136767f245ab@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b9e441b8-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I better explain my problem. :)
> I have a CGI for Apache. I wrote it in C, and it simply parses text
> from a html textarea, giving another html in output. I made it as a
> state machine which outputs and outputs according to the input
> characters.
>
> Apache communicates with the CGI process with two pipes linked to the
> process' stdin and stdout.
> But I think that apache code is like this:
> while()
> {
>   read(socket,buffer)
>   write(pipe_process1, buffer)
> }
> while()
> {
>   read(pipe_process2, buffer)
>   write(socket,buffer)
> }
>
> Therefore, if I had a CGI similar to 'cat' (and I have), it would
> deadlock due to the pipe_process2 not being read by apache if it gets
> filled, the process blocks, and then pipe_process1 gets filled.

no, you wouldn't.

i believe the problem is the cgi and apache disagree on the termination
condition.  make sure you close the fd 0 when you are done reading.

- erik