* [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx [not found] <3717d8ce779c6f31d7e5c922eb34f00c@swcp.com> @ 2010-06-08 6:22 ` EBo 2010-06-08 13:10 ` ron minnich 2010-06-08 18:06 ` [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency yard-ape 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: EBo @ 2010-06-08 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: plan9-gsoc, 9Fans-list Sorry for the delay. While working on the next release of tvx, TCL's maintainers have been away for a little while and expect to get back to addressing uploading the newest version of tvx (including the proposed name changes) after Wednesday. Is anybody interested and willing to do some testing between now and then? If so, please upload the tarball from ftp://ftp.swcp.com/pub/tmp/tvx_tcz_files.tgz and uncompress them into TCL's /mnt/sd*1/tce/optional/. I am hoping with a bit of testing I can release version 1.0 of tvx, and start moving onto other things. As a note, this version includes: * name change from Tvx-* to tvx* (while this has been tested it has not completed TCL review/acceptance) * updates to tvx (including removal of -O3 flag, and cp's H/L or sudo option) * fixes to tvxroot (including missing mkfile.proto, etc.) * addition of Ron's 9pm, ratrace, and live hg pull instructions to tvxroot * minor patches to 9pm to avoid name clashes and use /tmp insead of current directory for downloaded iso's * establishing a tvxroot repository on bitbucket.org * add date tags to tvxroot repository to help manage automated builds. Thanks and best regards, EBo -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx 2010-06-08 6:22 ` [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx EBo @ 2010-06-08 13:10 ` ron minnich 2010-06-08 14:01 ` Skip Tavakkolian 2010-06-08 18:06 ` [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency yard-ape 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: ron minnich @ 2010-06-08 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: plan9-gsoc; +Cc: 9Fans-list btw 9pm is what we named the package manager. "It's 9pm. Do you know where your packages are?" ron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx 2010-06-08 13:10 ` ron minnich @ 2010-06-08 14:01 ` Skip Tavakkolian 2010-06-08 15:22 ` EBo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Skip Tavakkolian @ 2010-06-08 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > btw 9pm is what we named the package manager. this might cause a little confusion; 9pm is also the name of the plan9 emulation environment for windows. it is still the only environment available. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx 2010-06-08 14:01 ` Skip Tavakkolian @ 2010-06-08 15:22 ` EBo 2010-06-08 16:39 ` Lucio De Re 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: EBo @ 2010-06-08 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs >> btw 9pm is what we named the package manager. > > this might cause a little confusion; 9pm is also the name of the plan9 > emulation environment for windows. it is still the only environment > available. ouch... Ron, what should we do about this? EBo -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx 2010-06-08 15:22 ` EBo @ 2010-06-08 16:39 ` Lucio De Re 2010-06-09 4:10 ` ron minnich 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucio De Re @ 2010-06-08 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:22:33AM -0600, EBo wrote: > > >> btw 9pm is what we named the package manager. > > > > this might cause a little confusion; 9pm is also the name of the plan9 > > emulation environment for windows. it is still the only environment > > available. > > ouch... Ron, what should we do about this? > Different namespaces. I think we'll live... ++L ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx 2010-06-08 16:39 ` Lucio De Re @ 2010-06-09 4:10 ` ron minnich 2010-06-09 4:37 ` Lucio De Re 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: ron minnich @ 2010-06-09 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lucio, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote: > Different namespaces. I think we'll live... That's the point of private name spaces right? I doubt a linux distro is that much concerned with anything related to windows. ron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx 2010-06-09 4:10 ` ron minnich @ 2010-06-09 4:37 ` Lucio De Re 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucio De Re @ 2010-06-09 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:10:33PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote: > > > Different namespaces. I think we'll live... > > That's the point of private name spaces right? > > I doubt a linux distro is that much concerned with anything related to windows. > And I especially doubt that Windows will concern itself with a Linux distro. My point exactly. ++L ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency 2010-06-08 6:22 ` [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx EBo 2010-06-08 13:10 ` ron minnich @ 2010-06-08 18:06 ` yard-ape 2010-06-08 20:29 ` erik quanstrom 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: yard-ape @ 2010-06-08 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: plan9-gsoc, 9fans P9P sed gives me the error "Label too long" on: % echo foo | sed 's/./&/;ta;b;:a;s//*/' but not on: % echo foo | sed 's/./&/ ta b :a s//*/' As though the label commands require immediate newlines. Anyone else experience this? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency 2010-06-08 18:06 ` [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency yard-ape @ 2010-06-08 20:29 ` erik quanstrom 2010-06-08 20:33 ` erik quanstrom 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: erik quanstrom @ 2010-06-08 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Tue Jun 8 14:14:17 EDT 2010, yard-ape@telus.net wrote: > P9P sed gives me the error "Label too long" on: > > % echo foo | sed 's/./&/;ta;b;:a;s//*/' > > but not on: > > % echo foo | sed 's/./&/ > ta > b > :a > s//*/' > > As though the label commands require immediate newlines. > > Anyone else experience this? without having access to a unix machine right now, i'm guessing that the code at jtcommon should replace if(*cp == '\0') with if(*cp == '\0' || *cp == ';') at lines 428. similar change at line 328. - erik ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency 2010-06-08 20:29 ` erik quanstrom @ 2010-06-08 20:33 ` erik quanstrom 2010-06-08 22:30 ` yard-ape 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: erik quanstrom @ 2010-06-08 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > without having access to a unix machine right now, i'm guessing that > the code at jtcommon should replace > if(*cp == '\0') > with > if(*cp == '\0' || *cp == ';') > > at lines 428. similar change at line 328. sorry, fat fingers. 428 and 438. - erik ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency 2010-06-08 20:33 ` erik quanstrom @ 2010-06-08 22:30 ` yard-ape 2010-06-08 22:36 ` erik quanstrom 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: yard-ape @ 2010-06-08 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote: > > without having access to a unix machine right now, i'm guessing that > > the code at jtcommon should replace > > if(*cp == '\0') > > with > > if(*cp == '\0' || *cp == ';') > > > > at lines 428. similar change at line 328. > > sorry, fat fingers. 428 and 438. > > - erik Actually 328 is what I've got. But no change in behaviour after recompile. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency 2010-06-08 22:30 ` yard-ape @ 2010-06-08 22:36 ` erik quanstrom 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: erik quanstrom @ 2010-06-08 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote: > > > > without having access to a unix machine right now, i'm guessing that > > > the code at jtcommon should replace > > > if(*cp == '\0') > > > with > > > if(*cp == '\0' || *cp == ';') > > > > > > at lines 428. similar change at line 328. > > > > sorry, fat fingers. 428 and 438. > > > > - erik > Actually 328 is what I've got. But no change in behaviour after recompile. the plan 9 version works as you expect it should, and it's not a 32-bit rune problem because that works on my system. by looking at the differences between the p9p and plan 9 version, you should be able to find the problem rather rapidly. there's not much code involved. - erik ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-09 4:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <3717d8ce779c6f31d7e5c922eb34f00c@swcp.com> 2010-06-08 6:22 ` [9fans] request for testers of next beta release of tvx EBo 2010-06-08 13:10 ` ron minnich 2010-06-08 14:01 ` Skip Tavakkolian 2010-06-08 15:22 ` EBo 2010-06-08 16:39 ` Lucio De Re 2010-06-09 4:10 ` ron minnich 2010-06-09 4:37 ` Lucio De Re 2010-06-08 18:06 ` [9fans] Sed label handling inconsistency yard-ape 2010-06-08 20:29 ` erik quanstrom 2010-06-08 20:33 ` erik quanstrom 2010-06-08 22:30 ` yard-ape 2010-06-08 22:36 ` erik quanstrom
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).