Re: [9fans] git on plan9

[drivers@0xabadba.be]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 415 bytes --]

	I currently have hg and this bookmarks git module working on plan9. Russ, thanks for the clue -- i have this packaged up now (my first package but doesn't seem like rocket science.  Please let me know if you are interested.  Also to be honest 98% of this was Filipe and FGB i just put a few pieces together to get 1.3 and git working nicely together.

hope everyone is doing well,

respectfully,

james toy

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5574 bytes --]

From: "Federico G. Benavento" <benavento@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] git on plan9
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:25:06 -0300
Message-ID: <32d987d50907161625x3e25f395k8257a34605f9fabb@mail.gmail.com>

ok, I didn't get this the first time, so this is not the hg which is in sources
this is hg 1.3

cpu% hg clone --traceback http://bitbucket.org/jespern/django-piston/
destination directory: django-piston
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 161 changesets with 309 changes to 67 files
updating working directory
53 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
cpu%

the one i have installed just works, notice is the same link you provided.
as I told you yesterday, hg changes a lot of stuff from release to
release, and it's probably ape's fault.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Federico G.
Benavento<benavento@gmail.com> wrote:
> and my reply to that was:
>
> my patch behaves exactly like chmod(1), so those bits are inherited
> I think this is the right thing to do as posix doesn't support those bits.
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/sys/stat.h.html
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Federico G.
> Benavento<benavento@gmail.com> wrote:
>> it was loosing the dir bit, from the readme:
>>
>> Fixed chmod and fchmod, they were ignoring the dir bit.
>>
>> federico
>>
>>
>> from the notes:
>>
>> Fri May 30 00:04:19 EDT 2008 geoff
>>    should append-only and exclusive-access be cleared,
>>    inherited or settable via the mode argument?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 6:17 PM, ron minnich<rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I may be missing it, but what particular thing in the chmod failed?
>>> What was it trying to set?
>>>
>>> ron
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Federico G. Benavento
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Federico G. Benavento
>



-- 
Federico G. Benavento