From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 02:56:58 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <4d020516bf59f1015e33145d36858014@kw.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <4A0E7310-9D9D-45C5-88A3-62B4A3191267@quintile.net> References: <3816729a-a9d5-4f63-9850-c7247edae37e@c16g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <4A0E7310-9D9D-45C5-88A3-62B4A3191267@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Kernel panic when allocating a huge memory Topicbox-Message-UUID: d086104a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat Nov 3 02:54:52 EDT 2012, steve@quintile.net wrote: > if you use the 9front distribution swap works, > if you use the either 9atom or the labs distribution it does not. > > the labs or erik may take the fixes from 9front but there are good reasons > for dropping swap all together - it is very slow, rarely used, > and ram is cheap these days. > > i think this is a fair summary. yup. 9atom is dropping swap since the current setup conflicts with multiple page sizes, and i haven't run swap on any machine for 10 years. - erik