From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4d1e564f1e2a2b8093ea17dfd56ef123@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] USB developments
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
In-Reply-To: <fa94d592591f3ac06a396cd7db5e9bf1@hamnavoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:53:07 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b9e9de6c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I would still rather see usb mass storage
> provided as a self contained file server rather than as a "driver"
> wired into the kernel -- then a normal 9P interface suffices.
> What's the objection to this high level approach?

I'd certainly vote for this, after the usbhid experience.