From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4da726d2f0b1704627da8d83693168b3@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] any reason not to have srv in namespace?
In-Reply-To: <db2ee7a8105e55024837b675b3f9410e@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:14:27 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 862bf368-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

I don't think srv should be there. 
For one thing, it's too big and clunky.

Cpurc and termrc exist to set up 
the initial environment.  Namespace
is for setting up a new name space
from the existing environment.