From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4e2716f33a9d97d128adc2113f2d7624@plan9.escet.urjc.es> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] broken vac From: Fco.J.Ballesteros In-Reply-To: <200302031536.h13FanR19682@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-dkjxaijbcrizkgrnmjgzivercs" Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:17:45 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4d643ea0-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-dkjxaijbcrizkgrnmjgzivercs Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit last time I checked, replica was taking care of running a binary relocated to /tmp just to avoid the binary getting changed under feet. --upas-dkjxaijbcrizkgrnmjgzivercs Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Mon Feb 3 16:37:22 MET 2003 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.16.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 312D5199DD; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:37:07 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.10.247]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 12FD219992 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:36:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from zeus.cs.utwente.nl (zeus.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.10.12]) by utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h13FaqGo017927 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:36:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl (zamenhof [130.89.13.77]) by zeus.cs.utwente.nl (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h13Fan7U029655 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:36:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (belinfan@localhost) by zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id h13FanR19682 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:36:49 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200302031536.h13FanR19682@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> X-Authentication-Warning: zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl: belinfan@localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with version: MH 6.8.3 #20[UCI] To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] broken vac In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Feb 2003 09:53:00 -0500." References: From: Axel Belinfante X-Organisation: University of Twente, Department of Computer Science, Formal Methods and Tools Group, PO Box 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands X-Phone: +31 53 4893774 X-Telefax: +31 53 4893247 X-Face: 3YGZY^_!}k]>-k'9$LK?8GXbi?vs=2v*ut,/8z,z!(QNBk_>~:~"MJ_%i`sLLqGN,DGbkT@ N\jhX/jNLTz2hO_R"*RF(%bRvk+M,iU7SvVJtC*\B6Ud<7~`MGMp7rCI6LVp=%k=HE?-UCV?[p\$R? mI\n2/!#3/wZZsa[m7d;PKWiuH6'~ List-Archive: Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:36:49 +0100 I am almost certain I did not. I'll see if I can try to reproduce it, some time later. I'm hesitant to try now since I still have a vac running at the moment. If I can reproduce I'll let you know. FYI, possibly related: is similar code in replica/applychanges (or similar name)? Some weeks ago I tried to replica/pull to a pcmcia disk in a bitsy, and the arm replica/applychanges broke. I did not want to spend much time on it so I just exported the kfs from the bitsy to a pc and did the replica/pull on the pc (which worked fine). However, at the time I did have a quick look with acid on the broken proces, and at least the function names seemed similar. Axel. > did you do a pull while you were running that vac? > if so, it may have broken just because the text file > changed underneath it and it got confused when it > paged in a new section. --upas-dkjxaijbcrizkgrnmjgzivercs--