From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4e4131bbc778bb7ec9187003a394fae9@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:44:37 -0400
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <62ccd0b2013a38ae24484b649a957d8c@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] MIPS - P9P acme seems OK
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fc673674-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri May 22 10:29:54 EDT 2009, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> Is it unreasonable for me to rejoice that P9P compiles without (much)
> trouble on the Yeeloong (Orchid) Notebook from Lemote?  I started acme
> and superficial use suggests that it will work on this particular MIPS
> architecture without any hitch.  I must concede that it is a point in
> favour of GCC.

in favor of gcc over against what?  p9p always uses gcc.

- erik