From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:20:30 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <4e5118b000fadeed93db312154ee4575@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <80c99e791001240502v3e7c955ek130ded319bb03ef5@mail.gmail.com> <80c99e791001240955m726daae0w16d5f1ab4454d7ee@mail.gmail.com> <3e1162e61001241209j1593ad03m3183aae443427c92@mail.gmail.com> <26DD1048-064D-43D3-8C62-60450FD411A8@fastmail.fm> <80c99e791001270523i4b63f1easffb015894ec38cd4@mail.gmail.com> <967f8c7c0977f7a2ef9611430135b9b3@brasstown.quans> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] mount acme on plan9port Topicbox-Message-UUID: c8c27b7a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Jan 27 09:37:02 EST 2010, rogpeppe@gmail.com wrote: > fuse is probably just doing a stat of each file, as is > conventional and necessary in unix. > > the 9p fuse converter can't legitimately cache the > qids from the directory read, so there's probably > no other way. why is it walking there in the first place? i might be able to understand fuse reading the top level directory. but new isn't even at the top level. - erik