From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4eb40e27af33e5adc8826e1b8ec660e3@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:01:10 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] sources/contrib
In-Reply-To: <32d987d50711201557q597aefb5s73eeacb9db66b56f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 05278fd6-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Nov 20 18:59:51 EST 2007, benavento@gmail.com wrote:
> > i have seen the case where applychanges was very slow.  but using cphist
> > instead solved the problem.  i can't explain why applychanges can be very
> > slow for me.
> 
> I if I'm not mistaken, applychanges uses a single proc, where applylog has
> more workers.
> 

you're right.  i ment applylog.

- erik