9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bela Valek <bvalek2@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Shall we fix the use of Up/Dn arrows?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:59:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ecada1e1001230159o796a15c9n1c916e2b004c30e4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7aee91501001230115q5285b2ebyd2df99db84f6855d@mail.gmail.com>

I agree, but only because PgDown and PgUp do the same as the Down and
Up arrows. Having two pairs of keys doing the same thing on the
keyboard is a waste. On the other hand, I found it easy to get used to
the Plan 9 approach. Its comfortable for me either way, I only think
that this modification would add a new functionality to the interface.

2010/1/23 Yi DAI <plm.day@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Plan9. This request sounds quite simple/naive. Don't think that
> I dislike the Plan9 ways. I enjoy it a lot. But it doesn't mean that it
> needs no improvement/fix, right?
> OK, here is my suggestion. We shall fix the use of Up/Dn arrows, I mean,
> instead of using it to go one page up/dn, use it to move the cursor up/dn
> one line. Here are two reasons for this:
> 1. We use Lf/Rt arrows to move the cursor, don't we? Then use Up/Dn to do
> the same kind of task is symmetric, and thus more reasonable.
> 2. We already have PageUp/PageDown keys which do the task of paging up/dn,
> and symmetrically, Home/End to move to the first and last page.
>
> EOT
>
>
> --
> DAY
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-23  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-23  9:15 Yi DAI
2010-01-23  9:35 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-01-23  9:59 ` Bela Valek [this message]
2010-01-23 10:21 ` John Stalker
2010-01-23 14:29   ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-23 12:37 ` cinap_lenrek
2010-01-23 12:52 ` Rudolf Sykora
2010-01-23 13:07   ` Yi DAI
2010-01-23 17:13   ` blstuart
2010-01-23 19:01     ` Rudolf Sykora
2010-01-25 17:20       ` maht
2010-01-26 11:50         ` Rudolf Sykora
2010-01-26 12:26           ` yy
2010-01-26 12:34           ` Robert Raschke
2010-01-26 14:16             ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-23 19:10 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-23 19:25   ` Rudolf Sykora
2010-01-24  0:53     ` Russ Cox
2010-01-24  7:08 ` Frederik Caulier
2010-01-24  9:08   ` Yi DAI
2010-01-24 18:03 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-24 22:28   ` Charles Forsyth
2010-01-24 18:41 ` John Floren
2010-01-25  9:46 ` Pavel Klinkovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ecada1e1001230159o796a15c9n1c916e2b004c30e4@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bvalek2@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).