From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4f0fdf304c3a40b3003d474e0b7b92ff@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum/802.1x catch 22?
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:48:46 +0200
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920703250512w3cd9f51ftbf8259302653962a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 30c9fd28-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Replacing /sys/src/9/boot/boot.c and friends with a set of shell
> scripts has been in my TODO for a while now, the current code is too
> rigid and inflexible, and expanding it would make it too complex,
> replacing it with easily customizable shell scripts would solve many
> problems.

Which shell?  I thought rc(1) was deemed obsolescent?

++L