From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <404df7e5d05c5ae6057ea214164f0d0d@quintile.net>
References: <57928816a76e769327ca134d7e28bd06@bellsouth.net>
	<404df7e5d05c5ae6057ea214164f0d0d@quintile.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:20:08 -0700
Message-ID: <4f34febc0904171320i6f983423l418e56420581db5f@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Barham <jbarham@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e399532a-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Steve Simon wrote:
> I cannot find the reference (sorry), but I read an interview with Ken
> (Thompson) a while ago.
>
> He was asked what he would change if he where working on plan9 now,
> and his reply was somthing like "I would add support for cloud computing".

Perhaps you were thinking of his "Ask a Google engineer" answers at
http://moderator.appspot.com/#15/e=c9&t=2d, specifically the question
"If you could redesign Plan 9 now (and expect similar uptake to UNIX),
what would you do differently?"