From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:33:47 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <4f93454e684856a36d112bcf38bf55ad@lilly.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJSxfmK7q5bzsSf1yoaMmAt++HzGpghPpSBsrN0Fp+mY+9k07A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEAzY3-ExHEG-6w26pb5XXFHJYmEUcxzxiTY68CkyF_2NNTozw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1a3157d28f8065b3a7072365eb88e464@hamnavoe.com>
	<CAJSxfm+YuHakG8==ZrN2UThk8jPkh-MPSNXkbVXV=Us9e6n=7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<946b13a27fb5903bebb050afe1f21089@lilly.quanstro.net>
	<CAJSxfmK7q5bzsSf1yoaMmAt++HzGpghPpSBsrN0Fp+mY+9k07A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] running plan9 : an ideal setup?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2c595c32-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed Nov 19 00:36:36 EST 2014, skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com wrote:

> i'm a bit paranoid about ether frames jumping the switch somehow, but i
> guess that's as likely as local snooping while tftping the boot image that
> has the nvram with creds.

your switch is really broken if it forwards ethernet frames (no tcp, no ip).
off the local segment.  it's already a security concern.

i've never seen this happen.

- erik