From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4feb042869f20f48cc1834355de43f33@9fs.org> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] ddc From: nigel@9fs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:59:14 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 17a9355e-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > This sort of attitude does nothing but contribute to the failure of Plan 9 > which makes -ANY- contribution that one might make a waste. Actually it was a genuine question, no tact, no insult intended. I really wanted to understand where you are coming from. It seems you feel that Plan 9 has failed, and so ANYone contributing to it is wasting effort. Fair enough; I understand your position. In that case, this applies to Russ as much as anyone. You have just had him contribute something when, not only was it against his better judgement, but yours as well. So I'm searching for an understanding. You must want the code, and this is supported by your 'thank you' email. So the code isn't entirely useless to you. In that case, contributing it to Plan 9, on the face of it, doesn't seem entirely wasted. I have to say that I find this slightly inconsistent, but it's not the big issue for me. We'll move on to my original question. If Plan 9 has failed (in your opinion), you don't want the code for Plan 9. You must want the code for something else, a different operating system, to learn from, I don't know, it's not important. In short, you feel it might have value, and therefore should be 'out there' so that the community can judge its usefulness, irrespective of the creator's opinion. Again, I understand your position here. Right. I'll rephrase my question, omitting Plan 9, in case that is the sticking point. It was > Can I ask what Hangar 18 users have contributed to the > Plan 9 code base? It is now: Can I ask what code Hanger 18 users have contributed to the community? And also: What code do the Hangar 18 users have that they haven't made available to the community yet? Remember, it's not for you to judge its usefulness.