From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: nospam@me.kom
Message-ID: <4uahetcdmvk9fd2hd98ar307m83hnqkeh5@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20010426231220.A2383@localhostnl.demon.nl>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Awk or Limbo ?
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:14:09 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9408fa3c-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 21:32:27 GMT, wstan@localhostnl.demon.nl (William
Staniewicz) wrote:
>Some people mention Limbo and AWK. Which is used
>daily by the Plan9'rs?

presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com and boyd@planete.net both prefer (and
use(*) limbo, but there seems little evidence to me of common use as a
language to build applications for Plan9. Why is that?

(*) http://mapage.noos.fr/~repo/