From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5008487412352db1ce99580291ff8c1b@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:32:52 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <9ab217670812230643i2a0c1b9r7efcc69bcceb1d98@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx il has slight speed advantage
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6e300548-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> 2008/12/23 erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:
> > first from il
> > ; time cat gs>/dev/null
> > 0.00u 0.00s 9.70r        cat gs
> >
> > next via tcp
> > ; time cat /386/bin/gs>/dev/null
> > 0.00u 0.00s 40.27r       cat /386/bin/gs
>
> I wonder if this is because of the timer in 9vx being less granular
> and causing the TCP timer processes to fire late -- thus having to
> deal with retransmits?

msec timing isn't good enough?  i really doubt it.

- erik