From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <505a46af0607250758v6d98d6f5k108312560fc7c28c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:58:24 +0100 From: "Darren Bane" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [9fans] Re: 9fans Digest, Vol 27, Issue 52 In-Reply-To: <4c95e398035a59475b2d48d243fec3ea@vitanuova.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3e1162e60607241628s50e42262re44d206c4bd9c847@mail.gmail.com> <4c95e398035a59475b2d48d243fec3ea@vitanuova.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8c6c8692-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 25/07/06, rog@vitanuova.com wrote: !snip! > [for the record, the bit i stumbled over was the underlying tag/keyword store. so many > trade-offs in b-tree algorithms, and was that really what i wanted anyway?] This just reminded me of one of Caerwyn's Inferno projects: http://www.caerwyn.com/ipn/2005/07/lab-34-lexis-semantic-binary-model.html He'd be better able to say, but it should be possible to construct a namespace so it can search upas/fs mailboxes too. Presuming that using Inferno programs isn't a problem ... -- Darren Bane