From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <5063e887c4a2d79b261d7dda37da63a8@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 ports to unix (including libdraw)
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
In-Reply-To: <045171c657d6dd054029ea0a915a3355@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:16:30 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 75406380-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I've had good experience with Ken's file server, though perhaps the
> best part of that is automatic nightly dumps to stable, write-once
> optical storage.

That's the point I wish, although I'm using emulated WORM on scsi disks.
I have no doubt what kinds of bad will happen on my file server.
The file server is out of my consideration when something bad happened.
This is the very point I expect to the new file server.
I have no such skill to write such an exellent file server, and I'm not
complaining to anyone who are developping it.   However, if we must=20
concentrate our power to something, I'd like to say it's the file server.

I can continue to make Plan 9 more usable to may by writing some=20
applications though.   However, OS itself is not my bussiness.=E2=98=BA

Kenji