From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:25:18 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <50786da82a7de0d4c55dcfacdfb3d3b1@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimsBfx0PCLBNQ_nFjKFKTOETUhMAAbGyHZ05x61@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e9dcbb4575bd9e996107205d6ef24358@terzarima.net>
	<319CCC8A-7CC8-4814-8608-FFFA624C04FD@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=siEehhAmVhvvWWeH7q3g83A59myAjeL2y4MZU@mail.gmail.com>
	<96B1444A-B40A-4F42-A387-1129C87D1387@gmail.com>
	<E85E1C40-0321-48B1-9CC5-2F913CAEC117@gmail.com>
	<36690C89-48E9-4DA3-8C47-426756A2F819@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimsBfx0PCLBNQ_nFjKFKTOETUhMAAbGyHZ05x61@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] streams
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b2bf3326-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> i've also been experimenting with a 9p modification that
> suggested some while ago, allowing multiple outstanding
> requests to be queued in sequence. it works, but the code
> still needs quite a bit of polishing.

queued or sent?

- erik