From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <508387adb98fd96b35199cacd6b09cf7.squirrel@comfortstore.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100217182126.GC17100@nibiru.local>
References: <20100217143303.GC10816@nibiru.local>
	<0ffee4ba13816a49a6360ce6668e65f2@quintile.net>
	<c85efc901002170814v4812d9bdl432f00207289c0f4@mail.gmail.com>
	<3e1162e61002170828i451c9d81ka5061e492db6e6b4@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100217182126.GC17100@nibiru.local>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:38:19 -0500
From: "Corey Thomasson" <corey@comfortstore.net>
To: weigelt@metux.de, "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Binary format
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d5ba393a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>
> Even synthetic filesystems are good for moving bigger things to their
> own services, there're many cases where that wouldnt make sense, for
> example parsers. I doubt you'd really suggest putting an XML parser
> to its own filesystem for real productional use ;-p (having such a
> thing surely is a good idea for some cases, but for most cases an
> library would most likely be much easier and efficient.
>

Just because a library is the better idea doesn't mean it has to be shared.