From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <509071940609051931k7ffefa92n163b28df636f9c87@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  5 Sep 2006 22:31:08 -0400
From: "Anthony Sorace" <anothy@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [9fans] Aquarela usage
In-Reply-To: <2fe499bd2ce00229a70eb0f226d8a78b@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60609051710p1c707e56r985baf5f8dd2f1fa@mail.gmail.com>
	<2fe499bd2ce00229a70eb0f226d8a78b@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ae981b6e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/5/06, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> this is probablly not exactly what you want, but p9p's 9p(1)
> is able to read, write and ls a 9p connection.  i'm pretty sure russ
> has it going on osx.  it might be just enough in a pinch.

it does indeed work on OS X. we've got a significant system built
relying on OS X components being able to talk to inferno components
using the 9p stuff from p9p. it's not really fun for interactive use,
but for a significant set of programatic interactions it's just fine.

a FUSE port (since i don't have much hope of getting v9fs into Apple's
distribution) would be lovely.