From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <509071940708102210n7ad2374ch58777ebfecb6e2ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:10:38 -0400
From: "Anthony Sorace" <anothy@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9ee
In-Reply-To: <775b8d190708102133m225c8426k970125abb79bd384@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e1aafb4d82f8d9e98068363acfd5b0f8@quanstro.net>
	<2AFE29E7-7D07-4CEE-8FFD-7841B35CC563@telus.net>
	<775b8d190708102133m225c8426k970125abb79bd384@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a6854220-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

The compiler+library trick is very nice. The run-time portion sounds
very similar to rsc's 9pm; can you summarize the differences?
Primarily i'm interested in how much of a "mental context switch"
you've got between the Plan 9 and Windows worlds.