From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <509071940709261249o53f0e12eoffd78b4bdf448bd1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:49:36 -0400
From: "Anthony Sorace" <anothy@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] More venti sync woes.
In-Reply-To: <eac500f818855927c0396630f4312fa6@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <2d66fbbc1daa18a06dfafab790d9d9d9@quintile.net>
	<eac500f818855927c0396630f4312fa6@coraid.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c5dd5374-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/26/07, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:

// since venti is a user-level process, i would think that rather than
// solving the problem, disabling a cpu makes it less likely.

agree.

also certainly not the problem in any of the cases where I've
encountered this, as it's all been on one of two (significantly
different) single-proc systems.

a