From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <509071940711090655r445ab903sd820f3ebbb584836@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  9 Nov 2007 09:55:04 -0500
From: "Anthony Sorace" <anothy@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] cpu(1) design...
In-Reply-To: <df49a7370711090645u5e6c1ac6h82ab046d2068ba8c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <691e7ca02963cc4348bfb160ec4357de@quintile.net>
	<509071940711090640y7dd8f2d7u1605033984cacde3@mail.gmail.com>
	<df49a7370711090645u5e6c1ac6h82ab046d2068ba8c@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f04ed8b2-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

ah, i see. yes, i've been caught by that as well.

the problem is i've also been caught doing 'cpu system', thinking of
it as a parallel to ssh or telnet. i probably assume -c more often
than -h, but that does seem less consistent with other "remote access"
commands.