From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <509071940711201713j1e5844b1l76fb1f903a205f29@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:13:29 -0500
From: "Anthony Sorace" <anothy@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] SATA controller found by kernel but not 9load
In-Reply-To: <25d6bab9f893d88c9739b992399eaff0@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <509071940711200624g24959235pec792d4496f0ed86@mail.gmail.com>
	<25d6bab9f893d88c9739b992399eaff0@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 055f845e-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I'm not sure if 9loadsb600 is far enough along for bug reports to be
useful, but here you go.

It gets significantly further than it had been. Far enough that it
looks as though 9load's work might be done: it finds my plan9.ini and
loads the kernel indicated (both on a 9fat partition on sdE0).

Now, however, my booted kernels can't find their root partition on the
disk. They display the expected message about finding the sb600, but
attempts to boot off local!#S/sdE0/fossil return errors about not
being able to find the server. I'm certain that there's a valid fossil
partition there (I can mount it while booted off the CD). More
digging.
Anthony