From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <509071940812181356t6b867ac7wbc57dd9f833638ab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:56:03 -0500
From: "Anthony Sorace" <anothy@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <2ee83bc17c08e612f88e92dec27043db@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <509071940812170958s5cbfeb5w527ff4439ec2673f@mail.gmail.com>
	<d4fb7aca1e949248e92b494059d72477@coraid.com>
	<509071940812171121i5f7fc275j4925f07aca8369ec@mail.gmail.com>
	<2ee83bc17c08e612f88e92dec27043db@coraid.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Motherboard recommendations?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 691b2290-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i've look through the changes and am not clear on how the sb700 will
be handled. it sounded like you were saying all the sb[67]xx chips are
handled the same, but the did is different (439D). it it just a matter
of adding it to the big switch(p->vid) statement?