9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Sorace <anothy@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Small program "PlanKey" (paraphrase of DOSKey)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:50:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <509071940901290350w103904c6rea469880f7dac12e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ACCF003CBA3D09458207DB0CB86AD17DD660E7@XMAIL.asuch.cas.cz>

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:49 AM,  <cej@gli.cas.cz> wrote:

> How about turning acme to universal UI, in the style of old Oberon?

Acme very deeply believes that everything's just text. It would be
substantial effort to get it to be any more universal than that. I'm
aware of at least two independent efforts by very smart people who
stalled at about the same place.

>From a UI design perspective, it's not clear what it ought to look
like. More strongly, I'm not really convinced there *is* a good way
for a UI like that to work. You'd have all the problems the X11 tiled
window managers have, and if you don't separately provide for either
"floating" windows (as some of them do) or horribly throw tiles
around, things like viewing large postscript documents is going to be
hella disruptive.

I love acme, but I think rio's the right starting place for GUI
things. Maybe just move the menu into a pre-populated tag, similar to
Acme's.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-23 10:03 pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-23 10:50 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-23 11:27   ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 11:35 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 12:56 ` roger peppe
2009-01-23 14:14   ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-26 12:41     ` cej
2009-01-26 10:31   ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:29   ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  3:42     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27  4:43       ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  6:35         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27  6:44           ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27 20:01           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 20:10             ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:01               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:26                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:58                   ` sqweek
2009-01-27 23:42                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28  0:35                 ` Anthony Sorace
2009-01-28  5:59                   ` lucio
2009-01-28 19:00                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28 22:19                     ` Joel C. Salomon
2009-01-28 22:51                       ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-29  0:26                         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29  2:09                           ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29  8:49                             ` cej
2009-01-29 11:50                               ` Anthony Sorace [this message]
2009-01-29 13:04                                 ` roger peppe
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` cej
2009-01-29 16:14                                   ` jimmy brisson
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 15:20                                   ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 16:40                                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 16:52                                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 17:03                                       ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 17:09                                         ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-01-27  7:09     ` Russ Cox
2009-01-27 22:12       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:25         ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:31           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:43             ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:50               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 23:11                 ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 23:40                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-28  3:15                     ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-28  7:22                     ` Eris Discordia
2009-01-27 23:01         ` sqweek
2009-01-26 10:31 ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:21 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  9:37 ` Pavel Klinkovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=509071940901290350w103904c6rea469880f7dac12e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=anothy@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).