From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f158dc670903091355w46c23684ydb60cedc221afebc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <509071940903090635l48dcaccfu99c4d9e269e4ec0f@mail.gmail.com>
	<f158dc670903091355w46c23684ydb60cedc221afebc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  9 Mar 2009 23:29:24 -0400
Message-ID: <509071940903092029r56612290hcfa33dc434eacfa8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anthony Sorace <anothy@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] vac flattens trees?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b79774c8-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

that seems a little awkward. erik's suggestion is what i
think i'd really like. rog's would be okay, although still
somewhatawkward, were i on plan 9; since i'm not, i think
i have russ's option. so with -x, say i had a tree:

/dog
/cat
/fish/guppie
/fish/clown
/pig

and i wanted /dog, /cat, and /fish/clown. would three
includes be sufficent there, or do i need it include /fish and
then exclude /fish/guppie, to get the heirarchy?

i do wish more tools used proto. the format is so nice.