From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7d3530220907181357n6157ac85j923f3edf4bb57d9f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A62357A.3040705@tecmav.com>
	<7d3530220907181357n6157ac85j923f3edf4bb57d9f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:23:27 -0400
Message-ID: <509071940907181623o51712d81y31dcc1b0e0983e0f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anthony Sorace <anothy@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] About Plan9 on small systems
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 26db76ea-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

inferno's got lighter requirements in some ways, but has
the same class of CPU requirements (more or less). if you
have something lighter than that in mind, you might not get
plan 9 but the ideas could still be useful. ask google about
"styx on a brick" for an example of using styx (9p by
another name) on a really small embedded device to
export underlying capabilities.