From: iwanek@nttdata.co.jp
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] XP (was: code complexity)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:40:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F591D39557D511B12C0090274DCEBC03E588D7@noanet03.noanet.nttdata.co.jp> (raw)
On a related topic, what does people on this list think of
Extreme Programming (XP)?
XP is supposed to encourage
- writing readable code through pair programming,
- avoiding code bloat by refactoring,
but I have a feeling this is just a literature. I, for one, enjoyed
and profited from reading "The Practice of Programming" so
much more than reading any XP documents so far.
Is anyone practicing XP? Does it help at all to reduce code
complexity?
- kazumi
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-05 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-05 17:40 iwanek [this message]
2002-02-05 17:49 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-06 20:15 ` Laura Creighton
2002-02-06 23:04 ` Steve Kilbane
2002-02-06 0:10 geoff
2002-02-06 10:42 ` Boyd Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F591D39557D511B12C0090274DCEBC03E588D7@noanet03.noanet.nttdata.co.jp \
--to=iwanek@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).