From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60710240930y27c36100m39062bd3b4743b59@mail.gmail.com> References: <3e1162e60710231532v5e995af1g992b79620b56a7b2@mail.gmail.com> <20071024033229.2F6265B3E@mail.bitblocks.com> <3e1162e60710240930y27c36100m39062bd3b4743b59@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <513EA329-79A6-425B-A764-0798FDD6AF03@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Pietro Gagliardi Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 installation disc question Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:14:52 -0400 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d8618088-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 OK, that's fine. So I still don't know what is wrong, but I'll try drawterm when I get Plan 9 up on the network (see my Broadcom emails; I'm buying a card soon) On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:30 PM, David Leimbach wrote: > > > On 10/23/07, Bakul Shah wrote: > Mac OS > X is still 32bit last I checked. You're likely having an EFI related > > issue. > > MacOS X 10.4.9+ is already 64 bit capable, at least on the > MacBook Pro > > $ sysctl machdep.cpu.brand_string > machdep.cpu.brand_string: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7400 @ > 2.16GHz > > $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64 > hw.optional.x86_64: 1 > > $ cat > ilp.c #include > int main(int c, char**v) { > printf("i:%d l:%d ll:%d p:%d\n", > sizeof(int), sizeof(long), sizeof(long long), sizeof > (void*)); > } > EOF > > $ cc -m32 ilp.c -o ilp4 > $ cc -m64 ilp.c -o ilp8 > > $ file ilp4 ilp8 > ilp4: Mach-O executable i386 > ilp8: Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64 > > $ ilp4 > i:4 l:4 L:8 p:4 > $ ilp8 > i:4 l:8 L:8 p:8 > > it's increasingly offtopic but yes :-) > > The whole system is not 64bit end to end. Objective C and Cocoa > aren't yet 64bit, and I've yet to fail to get alignment errors with > certain C memory allocation functions on my MBP with Tiger. > > I hope it's all fixed Friday, not that I see me using 64bit apps > too much, I don't think I have enough RAM, even if the extra > registers give me a bit of a performance boost :-) > > Dave