From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <517F59DD.8010108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:42:53 +0200 From: Jens Staal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130403 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 9fans@9fans.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC 2013] Implement plan9 commands in Go, Goblin Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4bbf42e0-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 2013-04-29 21:11, Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu wrote: > This looks like a reasonable list: > > Alternatively, one can implement rc(1) or awk(1) in Go, rather than > implementing all the base tools. > > -- > Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu > The "oh" shell is (or used to be) an rc-like implementation in go so if=20 that one (with modifications) got included in goblin, that is one more=20 that can be scratched from the list. https://github.com/michaelmacinnis/oh The bad stuff for Plan9 would be the external dependencies of libtecla=20 and ncurses (still have not been able to get ncurses to work :( ), so=20 there would have to be lots of modifications probably.