9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ethan Gardener" <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Foundation new releases question
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 13:57:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519b604b-ca94-49b3-bfd5-e26d9d4988b1@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5E822557334CF8E10AD34450F8015D4A@felloff.net>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, at 3:39 PM, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote:
> > Yep. I might be able to understand that change, but less so the later breaking change to 9p auth.
> 
> What 9p change for auth are you talking about?
> 
> The dp9ik implementation in 9front just uses p9any to negotiate
> it and p9sk1 is still supported; tho by default we have p9sk1
> disabled at the authentication server now to prevent the offline
> dictionary attack on the DES encrypted tickets that p9sk1 uses
> (tho it can be enabled by a flag in the authservers startup script).
> 
> The code changes to have both auth protocols work concurrently
> was actually the thing that took the most work and it took
> over a year of transition period until we could disable
> p9sk1 by default.
> 
> I'm not aware of anyone changing 9p.

I'm confused now. I'm sure someone official bypassed the existing mechanism to add a new auth protocol. I thought the existing mechanism was p9any, but perhaps I was wrong.

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tc472e4a0c0b6f084-Mdec75a41815793ccfe5cc9b4
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01 16:31 leimy2k via 9fans
2021-04-01 17:03 ` sirjofri
2021-04-02  4:20   ` Lucio De Re
2021-04-02  5:25     ` Devon H. O'Dell
2021-04-02  8:34       ` vic.thacker
2021-04-02 15:06       ` Devon H. O'Dell
2021-04-02 16:53         ` hiro
2021-04-03 15:27     ` Ethan Gardener
2021-04-03 15:37       ` hiro
2021-04-03 15:39         ` hiro
2021-04-03 15:47           ` Keith Gibbs
2021-04-03 18:17             ` hiro
2021-04-05 11:43             ` Ethan Gardener
2021-04-06  2:05               ` Anthony Martin
2021-04-08 14:39               ` cinap_lenrek
2021-04-09 12:57                 ` Ethan Gardener [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=519b604b-ca94-49b3-bfd5-e26d9d4988b1@www.fastmail.com \
    --to=eekee57@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).